The most important thing for me is to *not* need to mess around with scans on an individual ad-hoc basis. I'm curious - are you saying Silverfast scans faster with the 9000 than Vuescan? I would have thought the speed is very hardware-dependent (for instance, I see no difference between Vuescan and Nikon Scan). Have you tried scanning as normal TIFF (not linear)? I find this gives much better results with the highlights on E6 films (which in a way is similar to the scenario you describe) and then post-process in Photoshop or Lightroom (and don't forget to try ACR I am using this more and more these days for all three film types). I'm shooting all my C41 at two stops over and have no problems generally speaking. But do you really find that it is difficult to recover a high-key/over-exposed C41 frame in post? Hi Mani, this would be a dramatic prospect, indeed. Instead of this, the tones get redistributed across the entire range of the histogram - which gives a highly contrasty scan where the opposite is what I intended.
But one scenario in particular exposes a problem I keep having trying to export totally flat, linear, color-negative scans: when the entire image is high-key (over-exposed or simply an image that's intentionally just one narrow section of the full tonal range), I find that pretty much nothing I do will give me a scan that is correctly flat and at the same time only fills the correct part of the histogram. I've been pretty satisfied with Vuescan the last few years.
Silverfast ai studio 8 demo crack > Silverfast Ai Studio 8. As a variant of the professional scanner software SilverFast Ai Studio 8, SilverFast X-Ray 8 has been specifically designed for digitizing.
0 kommentar(er)
